Kamis, 19 Mei 2011

derrick rose bulls dunk

derrick rose bulls dunk. Derrick Rose Derrick Rose #1
  • Derrick Rose Derrick Rose #1



  • marcosscriven
    May 6, 02:46 AM
    Fake. Yet another chipset change would lead to many unnecessary problems.

    Like some others have said - Apple, being so wonderfully customer-experience focussed, wouldn't do this is there weren't some tangible benefits that outweighed the downsides.

    Yes, this could be a 'fake' rumour, but it's certainly well within the realms of possibility.

    As I mentioned above, the biggest hurdle would be x86 emulation. I would suspect ARM are looking at that closely, and would have some kind of on-chip functionality to speed up that process.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. chicago ulls derrick rose
  • chicago ulls derrick rose



  • Applejuiced
    Mar 26, 11:11 PM
    Change the thread title!!!! Whats with all these crappy/misleading titles lately!!!

    Just to get attention that's all.
    I doubt iOS 5.0 or the next iphone will be delayed.
    Nonsense.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. derrick rose dunk bulls.
  • derrick rose dunk bulls.



  • adbe
    Mar 29, 02:42 PM
    Why use Japanese companies over American Companies. If they are made in China by a Japanese company why would that be cheaper than an American company being made in China? Also if the plants are in Japan they are just as expensive or more to produce in Japan as it is in the U.S. Have you seen any cameras or t.v's made in Japan for the U.S? Japanese people will not buy a t.v or camera etc if it's made outside of Japan, that why they pay much more for products made in Japan. If they are not going to make them in their U.S. make them in China for the lowest cost.

    Perhaps because the Japanese supplier is the only company that can make the part well? Maybe they have the secret sauce, or just a serious patent portfolio.

    If Apple are sourcing from a company, it's because Apple have done the math and decided that company offers the best deal/quality.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. chicago ulls derrick rose
  • chicago ulls derrick rose



  • robertgenito
    Nov 3, 02:23 PM
    The next phases of Sopho's agenda:

    1) create more "viruses" and get as much media hype as possible. This will ensure a larger demand of their free product.

    2) once a significant number of users are registered and using their free product, force them to update their application--for new virus protection. this new update will lock them into a 30-day trial mode :) users will have to pay $60 per year in order to stay protected.

    I'm not worried at all honestly. I'm just even happier to be running a unix-based operating system :)





    derrick rose bulls dunk. Derrick Rose thinks Boozer is
  • Derrick Rose thinks Boozer is



  • anonalidall
    May 7, 10:55 AM
    Mobileme is certainly worth more than free. Apple doesn't scrape your emails and other data to target adds at you a la Google.


    Yes, but a la Google works. MobileMe is crap. So if they make it free then you'd either get free crap without ads, or free stuff that works with ads. Seems fair.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. derrick rose chicago ulls
  • derrick rose chicago ulls



  • lilo777
    Apr 18, 04:11 PM
    Perhaps you need to actually look at an iPhone 3GS and a Galaxy Tab sometime.

    http://www.coated.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Samsung-Galaxy-Tab-back.jpg

    http://phonerpt.com/wp-content/uploads/iphone-3g-white-live-picture.jpg

    Also consider these designs:

    http://common1.ziffdavisinternet.com/util_get_image/90/0,1425,i=90858,00.jpg

    http://www.promo-wholesale.com/Upfiles/Prod_m/Travel-Soap-Dish-W--Frosty-Top_20090828015.jpg





    derrick rose bulls dunk. Chicago Bulls#39; Derrick Rose (1) reacts after a dunk during the first half of Game 4 of a first-round NBA basketball series in Indianapolis, Saturday,
  • Chicago Bulls#39; Derrick Rose (1) reacts after a dunk during the first half of Game 4 of a first-round NBA basketball series in Indianapolis, Saturday,



  • hyperpasta
    Jul 30, 08:22 AM
    Really, guys. How many times have we been through this?





    derrick rose bulls dunk. No one, right Oprah
  • No one, right Oprah



  • danr_97070
    Jul 21, 04:25 PM
    You don't know much about this topic do ya :p

    This is the thing I was referring to; if I knew more about it, I'd be working for
    Intel or Apple... I guess...

    http://www.macosrumors.com/20060402B.php





    derrick rose bulls dunk. chicago ulls derrick rose
  • chicago ulls derrick rose



  • DomC
    Apr 5, 01:38 PM
    That takes some balls. Perhaps Toyota can have a say on some Apple product? I thought it was genius of Toyota to do the theme. They probably found the Scion buyer is the same demographic that jailbreaks a phone. Sounds like good marketing to me.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. Derrick Rose Bulls point guard
  • Derrick Rose Bulls point guard



  • miles01110
    May 7, 09:09 AM
    Finally, they'll be charging what the service is worth!





    derrick rose bulls dunk. derrick rose chicago ulls
  • derrick rose chicago ulls



  • lilcosco08
    Apr 26, 02:10 PM
    I lol'd at symbian in the last chart





    derrick rose bulls dunk. derrick rose bulls pics.
  • derrick rose bulls pics.



  • scoobydoo99
    Apr 25, 11:31 AM
    Besides if you encrypt your backup, nothing can happen. Thank you, have a good day.

    Puhleeeeze. We are not concerned about your average criminal or private investigator. We are concerned about the us government, homeland security, cia, nsa, fbi, etc.

    To say "nothing can happen" is absurdly naive.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. ulls, derrick rose dunk,
  • ulls, derrick rose dunk,



  • Eidorian
    Aug 11, 10:48 AM
    Which is exactly what I said in my post.

    I'm totallly confused as to why you're saying I was wrong here. The chip linked was Conroe, I said:

    Exactly what was wrong with this again, apart from your not reading it correctly?

    There is no current Mac that this chip can "drop into", apart from maybe a Mac ProYou can drop in Merom into the current socketed Yonah lines. That is what I was getting at.

    I know that the link (http://www.microdirect.co.uk/ProductInfo.aspx?ProductID=14564&GroupID=1674) that was posted was to a Conroe chip though.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. derrick rose chicago ulls
  • derrick rose chicago ulls



  • kalsta
    May 6, 10:14 AM
    Time to rename a Quarter Pounder into a "Royale with cheese"! :D

    They do actually call them Quarter Pounder's in Australia. And they insist on calling the chips 'fries' too! :rolleyes:

    Come to think of it… isn't it a bit odd that Americans attribute 'fries' to the French, but refuse to adopt their metric system? Go figure.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. derrick rose dunk bulls.
  • derrick rose dunk bulls.



  • Demoman
    Aug 7, 10:27 PM
    So if I want a mid-range tower, I can configured it to have less RAM, a smaller HD and a completely useless graphics card, and still come in $200-300 more than a comparable machine from Dell/Gateway/etc.? Why can't Apple sell me a desktop with 2GB RAM stock and a 250GB HD for less than two grand?

    Yes, the Apple is a quad instead of a dual - but exactly which apps does that matter on? Is a quad really going to be a vast improvement for Photoshop through Rosetta over, say, a single Xeon or 2.4 Conroe?

    All I ask for is a moderately priced OS X desktop that isn't crippled in any way (still paying for 802.11g! $350 to get a usable graphics card!).

    If using Windows didn't make my eyes bleed, I'd turn and run from Apple hardware in a heartbeat. (And that, of course, is why fanboy dreams of a retail OS X package for any computer would never happen - you'd have to be a fool to use Apple hardware.)

    Your logic completely defeats my ability to understand it. I use Apple hardware and do not like being called a fool by a 'user of a lesser God'.

    There does seem to be a market for a mid-range tower/desktop, user-configurable Apple computer. I am sure that if Apple can make the manufacturing and numbers come out, they will do this.

    But, the rest of your post seems to be useless, irrational grandstanding. Dell does not offer any decent video card standard, nor do they offer 2 GB of RAM. You say the graphics card is useless, but it is fine for a high-end file-server. Those wanting high-end graphics have two solid options.

    If you need to be schooled in "..but exactly which apps does that matter on?", this machine is definitely NOT for you. If you cannot find an Apple computer that fits your requirements, that is sad. But, you should have to walk away reluctantly, not "..turn and run from Apple hardware in a heartbeat."





    derrick rose bulls dunk. derrick rose chicago ulls
  • derrick rose chicago ulls



  • Hisdem
    Mar 29, 01:40 PM
    I'd pay a premium for products manufactured in the US.

    Products might be more expensive, but there would be more Americans employed. As much are there is a downside to producing here, there is also an upside.

    Yeah, but you have to think that Apple also sells outside the US. And then their products would be more expensive worldwide. I would not pay a premium to have a product that was built in the US. And I don't think the Europeans or Asians would either, to be honest.





    derrick rose bulls dunk. derrick rose dunks on
  • derrick rose dunks on



  • coder12
    Apr 18, 04:10 PM
    Have you looked at the TouchWiz UI? It's almost identical to iOS - dock at the bottom, pages of icons in a grid and you even remove applications in the same way as you do on the iPhone. I've nothing at all against competition for iOS, but they shouldn't just rip the design off


    http://www.sizzledcore.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/Galaxy-S-24-375x500.jpg

    Thanks! I was gonna post that myself but you already did it for me :)
    I'm not for this, but samsung really should go out on a limb and develop their own "style" of os for their little phones, or just use android default or wp7. I remember using a galaxy and thinking, "wtf mate?".





    derrick rose bulls dunk. Rose chicago ulls dunk
  • Rose chicago ulls dunk



  • AaronEdwards
    Apr 26, 04:52 PM
    wanna re-check that sunshine..?

    No. Why should I?





    derrick rose bulls dunk. Bulls#39; rookie Derrick Rose
  • Bulls#39; rookie Derrick Rose



  • Scottgfx
    May 6, 01:14 AM
    And putting ARM as a secondary processor so that Macs can run iOS apps? There's absolutely no need...

    Trying to graft an ARM processor into an Intel based system seems like a lot of added complexity. Apple doesn't like making things more complicated. Think of how simple and small the logic board is in the iPad.

    A ton of design decisions... How do the ARM chip and Intel chip share memory? Do we instead give each separate memory pools? Communication between the two chips... at what cost to performance? Who gets control of the display at what times? I very seriously doubt that a hybrid system will transpire unless Apple has developed some "secret sauce" for dealing with this problem.

    Do these two architectures even use memory in the same way?





    jholzner
    Aug 11, 09:37 AM
    Conroe has a much faster FSB, more cache, and ramps up much faster in clock speed.

    Merom and Yonah are replacements for Pentium-M. While Conroe is the replacement for the Pentium D. Conroe runs much hotter but not as hot as the old G5's. 45 C at full load for Conroe and 75 C for the 970FX.

    And if you're worried about wattage...

    http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/cpu/display/core2duo-shootout_11.html

    Yeah, what he said. This is basically the reason. He wants to get as much performance out of it as he can as he will be using it for his econ PhD and will be running all kinds of Unix apps and computational programs, though he can't afford a Mac Pro. He's replacing his Dell laptop and doesn't have a need for mobility so he figures why buy a desktop that is basically a laptop.

    Makes no sense to put these in Macbook so soon. Macbook Pro, yes, but not the macbook. Apple have always differentiated the two lines, the fact that current Macbooks are comparable to the Pros is just plain luck and won't last long, IMO.

    I think Apple is really going to push the 64 bit thing. I see them as moving all their computers to 64 bit compatible processors as soon as they can so they can push Leopard that much harder. I can hear them now: "We are the first to move our entire line to 64 bit!" Apples loves that sort of stuff. It may not even matter that much performance wise but as a marketing tool, it's golden.





    Don't panic
    May 4, 11:36 AM
    Did you ever define who is in your group?

    since no one split up, everyone is.
    we are just waiting for raven or chris to tell us if we found anything in the start room, and (with the caveat above) to know what happens when we enter the next room





    KnightWRX
    Apr 23, 07:36 PM
    They use a lot more CPU time to process though.

    Again, KDE 2.0, 10 years ago. My Pentium 2 333 mhz didn't break a sweat doing SVG icons then (the Krystal SVG icon theme). ;)

    I seriously doubt this is even an issue.

    You said yourself that wallpapers should be vector graphics. And by that, I presumed you meant the background in the subject of the thread. Safari supports SVG, but imo, it's not really a big thing that there's no support for it as a wallpaper. It's not the first thing people think of when they list Snow Leopard's shortcomings :P

    Sure it's not, but why bother making bigger and bigger pixel images when implementing vector art both has precedent (Gnome, KDE, all the Linux WMs or almost all of them) and is superior for this application.

    For images that can't be easily converted, I'm with you. But I don't understand the resistance to SVG support, which would be a decade late. Sure it's not a shortcoming, but in light of these stories, it would be a "nicer to have".





    Rt&Dzine
    Apr 16, 12:33 PM
    :mad::mad::mad: I am seriously starting to get pissed.

    9 Things the Rich Don't Want You To Know About Taxes (http://www.wweek.com/portland/print-article-17350-print.html)

    It's a long article so here are some excerpts;

    WTF does someone even do with 9 billion dollars?

    Don't you remember, it trickles down? Key points from your article.

    1. Poor Americans do pay taxes.

    2. The wealthiest Americans don�t carry the burden.

    Contrary to what Rand Paul says. The income tax is less than half of federal taxes and only one-fifth of taxes at all levels of government.

    3. In fact, the wealthy are paying less taxes.

    4. Many of the very richest pay no current income taxes at all.

    5. And (surprise!) since Reagan, only the wealthy have gained significant income.

    6. When it comes to corporations, the story is much the same�less taxes.

    7. Some corporate tax breaks destroy jobs.

    Due to loopholes and tax havens like the Cayman Islands. Average incomes fell during Bush years.

    8. Republicans like taxes too.

    President Reagan signed into law 11 tax increases, targeted at people down the income ladder. George W. Bush signed a tax increase, too, in despite his written ironclad pledge never to raise taxes on anyone.

    9. Other countries do it better.





    trip1ex
    May 6, 07:19 AM
    Not like they don't already have OSX running on ARM in-house.



    Tidak ada komentar:

    Posting Komentar